Think of shelters and clothing as art. Some of them are really fine, museum quality art.
At that level each is a masterpiece of achievement. The artist –whomever he or she was –stepped up and used their creative imagination and fine skills to produce a functional and beautiful structure or fine piece of clothing. They accomplished that in spite of the fact that they were constrained by the technology and tools of the time and the materials and resources that they had at hand. Most of the materials were local, some were traded for. Each piece — each fine work of art — came into being as a result of their skill and their creativity using the materials they had available. Furthermore, each artist had a deep understanding and respect for the materials they used. Let’s look at some examples from that perspective.
Having seen them, ideally what would you like to know about each of them? The answer is simple. It would be the information provided for any piece on display at a museum. That includes:
- Its name.
- The name of the community and culture it came from and
- hopefully, the artist’s name.
- Where it came from and
- when it was made.
- The materials used to make it
- the intricacies of its construction and
- the creative process — the way in which they got from the available materials to the finished product and
- its dimensions.
The same is true for the images that beautifully portray the shelters and clothing. They are not just tourist snapshots. They are fine images. In most cases fine photographs, like the photograph of a work of Nature by Ansel Adams, For them we would also like to know things like he name of the photographer and the details about the photograph or image. In that way each shelter or piece of clothing and its image is treated as a work of art and accorded the recognition and the honor they deserve. If the piece was produced using non-local materials, the community had to engage in trade. To do that, as a community they had to produce an excess of the product or products that others wanted and transport them to the buyer’s location. There they could exchange it for something they wanted that the distant suppliers had. The exchange took place at a mutually agreeable rate of exchange, i.e., price. Both parties benefited. Moreover, the exchange made it possible to create the work of art.
Clearly, available sources do not provide all information we would like to have. What we will do on the blog in the blog posts that follow, pertaining to clothing and shelter is document each as a work of art as best we can using the available information and giving credit to the sources. This will allow us to honor its creator and that of the image as an accomplished master, one who truly understood his/her craft and was creatively able to produce a masterpiece. It would be treating each piece for what it is, just like the work of a recognized master — like a Noguchi table, an Eames chair, a Frank Lloyd house, or Ansel Adams photograph — even though we may not know the name of the artist, especially in the instances of shelters or clothing designed and built by ancient peoples.
But it goes beyond that. I am an economist so I think it’s also important to acknowledge the indispensable function for which a shelter or clothing was created. Consequently, they fulfilled the requirement of providing two of the basic inputs, making it possible for the individual, their culture and the species to survive. (See Variation in the Ability to Perform) Importantly, they were able to do that in the very different and difficult environments they migrated to and found themselves in. That is pretty impressive. All we can do is acknowledge their contribution and say, “Thank you!”